Original system
((x1 v y1)^z1 ≡ (x3 v y3)^z3) => ((x2 v y2)^z2) =1
((x2 v y2)^z2)⊕ ((x4 v y4)^z4)) => ((x3 v y3)^z3) =1
((x3 v y3)^z3 ≡ (x5 v y5)^z5) => ((x4 v y4)^z4) =1
((x4 v y4)^z4)⊕ ((x6 v y6)^z6)) => ((x5 v y5)^z5) =1
Follow an idea proposed in P-40 solution (Helen Mironchick ) just with more or less complicated expressions for w1,w2,w3,w4,w5,w6. However, in particular case we would have different outgoing multipliers for bit 0 it would be 5 and for bit 1 it would be 3 vs previously considered ones.
((x1 v y1)^z1 ≡ (x3 v y3)^z3) => ((x2 v y2)^z2) =1
((x2 v y2)^z2)⊕ ((x4 v y4)^z4)) => ((x3 v y3)^z3) =1
((x3 v y3)^z3 ≡ (x5 v y5)^z5) => ((x4 v y4)^z4) =1
((x4 v y4)^z4)⊕ ((x6 v y6)^z6)) => ((x5 v y5)^z5) =1
Follow an idea proposed in P-40 solution (Helen Mironchick ) just with more or less complicated expressions for w1,w2,w3,w4,w5,w6. However, in particular case we would have different outgoing multipliers for bit 0 it would be 5 and for bit 1 it would be 3 vs previously considered ones.
Now make a substitutions ( kind of design had been suggested in P-40 from ege23.pdf )
w1=(x1 v y1)^z1


No comments:
Post a Comment